JMET 2009 Analysis

Exam Snapshot
No. of Questions 120
Sections 4
Marking Scheme 1
Negative marking 0.25
Number of Choices 4
Duration 180 Min

Students preparing for JMET-1009 spent quite a few anxious months wondering as to what the pattern could turn out to be. With the IITs specifying that JMET2009 would be a 180 minute long marathon and the syllabus clearly defined, it was anybody’s guess as to what was in store for them. However the surprise turned out to be a pleasant one as JMET-2009 was nowhere near the much feared JMET papers of yore. With the additional time available most would have maximised their attempts and consequently the cut-offs are bound to go up significantly.

Section 1: Verbal Communication

This section tested the candidates’ abilities with  

  • Comprehension     
  • Vocabulary (meanings, opposites, relationships, word pairs that cause confusion)
  • Grammar and Composition (sentence correction, arrangement of jumbled sentences)

Of the comprehension passages, two would have been easy to read for those with a regular reading habit. The questions from these two passages looked at detail, main ideas, implications and inferences. Some of the questions, especially those dealing with the main idea (title/essence) were a little tricky and required some thought. The 3rd passage (an excerpt from Bhagat Singh’s “Why I am an atheist”) made for difficult reading, not so much for the language as for the unfamiliar thoughts. Those who tried this passage would have found that it took some time. Once understood, however, the answers could be arrived at without too much difficulty, even through elimination. Two of the vocabulary questions were difficult but the well-prepared candidates (and those with a regular reading habit) would have found the others easy to deal with. The grammar and composition questions would have taken a little time to answer because of the length of the sentences / jumbling of sentences.  With careful reading, however, the errors were not difficult to spot.

The cut off mark in this section is likely to be around 10-12 marks.

 

Section 2: Logical Reasoning

The Logical Reasoning section of JMET would have caused the maximum heart ache for students on account of the ambiguous nature of the questions and some very evident mistakes in some sets. The section had 12 Qs from Analytical reasoning and a whopping 18 Qs from Critical Reasoning. There were at least 5 Qs in Analytical Reasoning that could have been answered with ease while the set of 5 Qs based on ‘persons living on different floors’ cannot be solved completely on account of some ‘missing’ information. The questions on Connectives and Deductions can be answered by most as they were on the easier side though one must say that they involved some thought on account of their apparent ‘trickiness’.

The cut off mark in this section is likely to be around 8-10 marks.

 

Section 3: Quantitative Ability

The Quant section of this year’s JMET saw a significant departure from the usual, especially in terms of the level of difficulty of the section. The overall look of the section, however, remained very similar to that of the previous few years’, i.e., the questions were mostly based on practical scenarios/business problems involving quant concepts, varying from differential calculus and probability distributions to simple equations and percentages. One peculiar observation that can be made regarding this section is that it was a lot easier than what it looked like. There were very few questions that could be termed as difficult and even questions that, at  first look, seemed to be lengthy or involve complex concepts were actually as simple as just formulating/summarizing the basic information given in the question rather than requiring any actual solving using advanced concepts.

The cut off mark in this section is likely to be around 7-8 marks.

 

Section 4: Data Interpretation

The Data Interpretation questions were for the most part quite straightforward and could have been solved by simple observation. A couple of sets which had multiple graphs would have appeared difficult and confusing and would have intimidated students. However beneath the tough exterior were a set of questions that were quite doable and with the additional time available this year students would have been able to crack these as well. Given that there were quite a few true/false questions; students could have unravelled them by working them out through the choices.

The cut off mark in this section is likely to be around 8-10 marks.

 

Sectional Scores and Overall Cut-Off

JMET is the qualifying exam and as such the cut-offs given are what we estimate is required to secure a rank. Each of the IITs could possibly have a different/higher sectional cut-offs depending on their selection process. Our estimate of the overall score required to get a call from different IIT’s is as follows:


Expected Overall Cutoff

Institute Expected Overall Cutoff
IIT - Bombay 70+
IIT - Delhi 65+
IIT - Kanpur 60+
IIT - Kharagpur
IIT - Chennai
IIT - Roorkee 50+

© All rights reserved T.I.M.E. (Triumphant Institute of Management Education) Pvt. Ltd.
Best viewed on 800x600 resolution.Recommended browser IE5+